← All allergens

Avocado allergy

Avocado allergy is an IgE-mediated immune reaction to proteins in Persea americana, the avocado, and what makes it unusual is that it travels with a latex allergy more often than it stands alone. In plain terms: the immune system reads certain avocado proteins as a threat, and a reaction can run from an itchy mouth to a whole-body allergic reaction that affects breathing and blood pressure, called anaphylaxis. It is a true allergy, not a sensitivity or an intolerance. Avocado is a fruit, and it is not one of the major allergens that food labels in the US or the EU must flag, so a label will rarely warn you about it. The single most important thing to know is that most clinically meaningful avocado allergy sits on the latex-fruit link: a person allergic to natural rubber latex can react to avocado, banana, kiwi, and chestnut, and the reverse can hold too (Blanco 1994, Brehler 1997).

If you or your child were just diagnosed, read this first.

This page is long on purpose. It is also the page to come back to. You do not need all of it today. This week, this is what matters:

  • If reactions have ever been whole-body, carry two epinephrine auto-injectors and learn the few signs that mean use one now. That is the section to read tonight (Emergency preparedness, below). If there is no prescription yet, that is the first call to the allergist.
  • Avocado is rarely flagged on a label, because it is not a regulated major allergen. So the habit is reading the full ingredient list, and watching for avocado oil and plant-based fat blends (Reading labels, below).
  • The big question is the latex link. If there is a known latex allergy, avocado, banana, kiwi, and chestnut are a tested question, not an automatic anything. And if there is an avocado allergy, ask the allergist whether to check for latex sensitivity (Cross-reactivity, below).
  • If there is a latex allergy, tell dentists, surgeons, and anaesthetists about it, so latex gloves and devices can be swapped. This is a precaution worth saying out loud at every appointment (How exposure happens, below).
  • Avocado is almost always eaten fresh. There is a real difference between fresh and cooked at the protein level, but because it is eaten fresh, that difference rarely changes day-to-day safety, and the eat-or-avoid call stays with the allergist.

Everything else here is waiting for you, in roughly the order the questions tend to come up. Read it when you want it.

Where a fact below is clinical, it carries its source. None of it is a substitute for your allergist.

What avocado allergy is, and who has it

Avocado allergy is an IgE-mediated immediate-type food allergy, and its defining feature is that isolated avocado allergy, without any latex sensitization, is uncommon. Most clinically relevant avocado reactivity sits on the latex-fruit syndrome axis (Blanco 1994, Brehler 1997). When someone allergic eats avocado, IgE antibodies on their immune cells latch onto the avocado proteins and trigger a release of histamine and other chemicals, usually within minutes to a couple of hours. That release is the reaction.

Avocado is a fruit, in the plant family Lauraceae. It is grouped clinically with the latex-fruit foods: banana, kiwi, and chestnut. The link is a shared protein. A class I chitinase in these fruits looks, to the immune system, like a protein in natural rubber latex, so sensitization to one can mean reactivity to the others. That is why this page keeps returning to the latex question: for avocado, it is the center of the picture, not a footnote.

Avocado is not well characterized by population prevalence studies, and it is not one of the regulated major allergens, so dedicated prevalence cohorts are sparse. There is no reliable general-population figure for isolated avocado allergy at the quality floor, so this page does not state one. What is documented is the other direction: among people who are allergic to latex, fruit reactions in the banana, avocado, and chestnut set are reported in a meaningful but cohort-dependent share, and avocado is among the most frequently implicated (Blanco 1994, Brehler 1997). Avocado allergy is most often described in adults, frequently in the context of latex sensitization, including occupational latex exposure in healthcare and other settings; it is not framed as a typically outgrown childhood food allergy (Blanco 1994).

Diagnosis combines the history with testing, and for avocado the testing has one high-value move: because of the latex link, evaluation for latex sensitization is usually part of the workup. The next section is the protein picture that move rests on.

The components that drive severity

Avocado is not one thing to the immune system. It is a handful of proteins, and which one a person reacts to changes how serious the reaction tends to be. For avocado, two proteins carry the picture, and they point in opposite directions.

A standard avocado test (the skin prick, or the basic blood test) only tells you the immune system has noticed avocado at all. A more detailed test, component testing, would break that down protein by protein. It answers the question that matters: is this the systemic, whole-body kind, or the oral-only kind? For avocado, the two results to understand are:

  • The kind that can turn serious is the protein your allergist calls Pers a 1. It is the class I chitinase, the latex-fruit protein, and it is the one capable of whole-body reactions. A person who reacts to this protein has the kind of avocado allergy that can go systemic, and it is the protein behind the latex link.
  • The kind that is usually oral-only is Pers a 4, a profilin. Profilin is a pan-plant protein that turns up on many tests across many pollens and foods, and it is often serological noise: a positive test without a consistent real-world reaction. When avocado reactivity is profilin-driven, it tends to be the oral allergy syndrome pattern, an itchy or tingling mouth without systemic features. It does not, on its own, tell you a food is safe to eat, and the decision to eat any form of avocado stays with the allergist, but it reframes a scary-looking positive test.

So the high-value move is the latex-and-axis conversation: ask the allergist whether to test for latex sensitization, and whether the avocado picture looks like the systemic chitinase axis or the oral-only profilin axis. You do not need to learn the protein names or the lab numbers yourself. The deeper version is below, written so the words on a lab report mean something when you want them to.

The deeper version: the avocado proteins and the testing picture (for your allergist conversation)

Component-resolved testing is run by ImmunoCAP (singleplex) or by a multiplex panel (ISAC or ALEX2). For avocado there is a practical limit worth knowing: avocado component testing is sparse on the common commercial platforms.

Pers a 1 is the class I chitinase, with a hevein-like domain, and it is the systemic-capable, latex-fruit allergen (the primary clinically relevant component). It is heat-labile, so heat processing reduces its reactivity, but it is sensitive to ripening and wounding. Pers a 1 is not a routinely available component on the common platforms, so discriminating the chitinase axis from the profilin axis is frequently inferential. Latex Hev b 6.02 (hevein) and a profilin marker can serve as surrogates: a latex/hevein-positive, systemic picture points to the chitinase axis, while isolated profilin positivity with oral-only symptoms points to the profilin axis (Brehler 1997).

Pers a 4 is the profilin, a pan-eukaryotic panallergen. It mediates oral-only reactivity and is largely serological noise: positivity is common and frequently does not correspond to a real-world reaction. It is the minor, local-oral component.

Because the relevant chitinase is heat- and processing-labile and commercial extract quality varies, prick-to-prick testing with fresh avocado is often more sensitive than commercial-extract skin testing for the labile allergen (Ortolani 1988). Whole-avocado specific IgE is available but, like the skin prick, does not by itself separate the systemic axis from the oral-only one. Given the strong association, evaluation for latex sensitization (Hev b 6.02) is a recommended part of the avocado workup. Where the history is ambiguous, a supervised oral food challenge with fresh fruit is the definitive test (NIAID Addendum 2017, EAACI 2014).

The avocado literature does not provide a grounded quantitative decision threshold (a kU/L cutoff or an eliciting dose) for Pers a 1 or whole avocado at the quality floor, so this page states none.

Cross-reactivity, real and cautionary

The honest version of this section leads with the caution that changes the plate, not with a reassurance. For avocado, that caution is the latex-fruit link, and it is the headline of the whole page.

The latex-fruit link is the thing to understand. Avocado, banana, kiwi, and chestnut share a class I chitinase that the immune system can confuse with a protein in natural rubber latex. So a person allergic to latex can react to avocado, and a person allergic to avocado on this axis can react to banana, kiwi, and chestnut, and the same person may react to latex itself (Blanco 1994, Brehler 1997). This is rendered as a confirm-with-your-allergist link, not an automatic verdict: a known latex allergy, or a positive test to one of these foods, is a reason to ask the allergist how it changes the others, not a reason to assume a reaction or to assume safety. The published proportions for how often these foods cross-react vary widely by cohort and by whether reactions were self-reported or challenge-confirmed, so this page does not convert them into a personal-risk number.

There is a milder, oral-only pattern, but it does not get a blanket reassurance. Some avocado reactivity is driven by profilin (Pers a 4), the pan-plant protein behind much oral allergy syndrome, and that pattern tends to be an itchy or tingling mouth without systemic features. It is a real phenotype, and it is the same broad profilin-and-pollen story that turns up across many plant foods. But whether a particular person can safely eat any form of avocado is not something this page will tell you, because a positive test does not separate the benign profilin pattern from the systemic chitinase pattern on its own, and the blanket reassurance “it is just oral allergy syndrome, so it is mild” is not cleared. The eat-or-avoid call, and any challenge, is the allergist’s. The profilin and oral allergy syndrome mechanism is the subject of a companion page that is being written.

Cooking changes the protein, but not the practical answer. The systemic-capable chitinase (Pers a 1) is heat-labile, so cooked or heat-processed avocado carries less of that protein’s reactivity. The catch is that avocado is almost always eaten fresh (guacamole, sliced, blended), so the heat-lability rarely changes real-world exposure, and fresh-form risk dominates. This page does not turn the heat-lability into a “cooked avocado is safe” reassurance.

There is no cleared cross-reactivity reassurance for avocado at this project’s verification floor, so this page does not offer one, and the absence is stated here plainly rather than dressed up as a comfort. The latex-fruit link above is the established edge, and it is a question to take to your allergist, not a cleared all-clear and not a cleared danger list. A dedicated latex-fruit syndrome page is being written; until it exists, the edge is described here and is not linked.

Hidden sources

Avocado is usually eaten as itself, but it hides in oils, plant-based products, and cosmetics, and because it is not a regulated allergen, a label will rarely flag it. These are worth a one-time read now; after that you will spot them on your own. The full label scan lives on the deep page linked at the end of this section.

Avocado oil, in food and in skincare. Avocado oil shows up as a “healthy” oil in dressings, mayonnaise, and snacks, and in soaps, lip balms, hair products, and facial oils. There is a nuance: refined avocado oil is typically low in residual protein and a lower-risk contact surface, while unrefined or cold-pressed oil retains more protein and is a more plausible contact surface. This page does not tell you that refined oil is safe for you; that is the allergist’s call. Treat unrefined or cold-pressed avocado oil, in food or on skin, as a real surface.

Plant-based and processed foods. Avocado is increasingly used as a fat base in plant-based and processed products: smoothies, dressings, vegan spreads, and some plant-based baked goods and ice creams. Because avocado is not emphasized on a label, the full ingredient list is the only guard.

Guacamole, dips, and prepared dishes. Guacamole and avocado dips are the obvious vehicles, and avocado turns up in sushi (the California roll), salads, and bowls. With unpackaged restaurant food, a chef card and a direct question do more than scanning a menu.

The full label lexicon, the labeling-law reality, and the cross-contact detail live on the deep page: where avocado hides.

How exposure actually happens

The route that causes serious reactions is eating fresh avocado. The rest are lower-risk than they feel, with two avocado-specific points worth naming.

Eating it (high). Swallowing fresh avocado protein is the route that causes whole-body reactions. Everything else is far behind it. Cooking reduces the systemic-capable chitinase, but avocado is almost always eaten fresh, so fresh-form risk is what governs day to day.

Mouth contact and the oral-only pattern (moderate). For the profilin-driven pattern, the reaction is an itchy or tingling mouth on contact with fresh avocado, the oral allergy syndrome shape, usually without systemic features. This is real but is the milder axis; it is not a reason to relax around the systemic axis, which a test cannot rule out on its own.

Skin contact (low but real, mostly via oil). The fruit itself on intact skin is a low surface. The more plausible contact route is cosmetic avocado oil, especially unrefined or cold-pressed, on broken or sensitive skin.

Breathing it in. There is no established cooking-vapor or aerosol hazard for avocado of the kind documented for some fish, so ambient exposure is not a recognized risk-bearing route.

The latex precaution worth saying out loud. Because avocado reactivity so often sits with latex sensitivity, the care-access point matters: if there is a known or suspected latex allergy, tell dentists, surgeons, anaesthetists, and other clinicians about it, so latex gloves and latex medical devices can be swapped for non-latex ones. This is a precaution to raise at every appointment; the treating clinician makes the call. The latex allergy itself is evaluated and managed with the allergist; this page names the consideration and routes the decision to the providers.

Reading labels

This is the habit that does the most day-to-day work, and for avocado it works differently than for a regulated allergen. Avocado is not one of the US FALCPA major allergens and is not on the EU Regulation 1169/2011 Annex II list, so it does not have to be declared in bold and a “contains” line will rarely warn you (FALCPA; EU 1169). The full ingredient list is the guard, not the allergen statement.

The words that mean avocado are avocado, Persea americana, avocado oil, avocado butter, guacamole, and the names alligator pear and aguacate. The terms to slow down on are the soft ones: “plant-based” fats and spreads, vegetable-oil blends that may include avocado oil, and “natural fats,” any of which can carry avocado without naming it prominently. When a term is unclear and the manufacturer will not say, treat it as a reason to call the company, not a reason to assume it is safe.

Precautionary labels (“may contain avocado,” “made in a facility that also processes”) are rare for avocado precisely because it is not regulated. Where one appears, how strictly to treat it is a personal call along a spectrum, weighing a real but variable cross-contact risk against ruling out a share of the grocery store. This page will not pick that threshold for you.

Severity, and what predicts a bad reaction

The strongest predictor of a severe avocado reaction is which axis is involved: the class I chitinase (Pers a 1) is the systemic-capable one, while isolated profilin (Pers a 4) positivity points toward the oral-only pattern (Blanco 1994, Brehler 1997). A known latex allergy raises the relevance of the systemic axis, because the chitinase is the shared latex-fruit protein. A history of a previous systemic reaction is the next strongest input. Avocado is not established as a cofactor-dependent food in the way some other plant foods are, so exercise or medication cofactors are not a defining part of its picture.

Here is the part that justifies carrying epinephrine where reactions have ever been systemic. The size of the last reaction does not reliably predict the next one, and a test does not cleanly separate the benign profilin pattern from the systemic chitinase pattern. A reaction that was only an itchy mouth once does not guarantee the next one stays mild. That is not a reason to live in fear; it is the reason the auto-injector travels where the history warrants it. The avocado literature does not give a quantitative severity threshold at the quality floor, so this page states none.

Emergency preparedness

Avocado anaphylaxis is treated epinephrine-first. Epinephrine is the first-line treatment for a severe reaction, not an antihistamine and not a wait-and-see. If you see anaphylaxis, you give epinephrine and then you call emergency services.

The signs that mean epinephrine now include any two body systems reacting at once (for example hives plus vomiting), or any single severe sign on its own: trouble breathing, throat tightness, a hoarse or weak voice, repetitive coughing, pale or floppy appearance, or a sense of impending doom in someone old enough to say so. When you are unsure, the guidance is to give epinephrine, because the danger of withholding it in a true reaction is far greater than the danger of giving it when it turns out you did not need to.

After giving epinephrine, call emergency services and lie the person down with legs raised, unless breathing is the main problem, in which case let them sit up. A second dose may be needed if there is no improvement in about five minutes. Anyone with a history of systemic avocado reactions should have a written anaphylaxis action plan and two epinephrine auto-injectors that travel with them.

This section is general. The individual’s own plan is the specific one, and it is the one to follow.

When you can’t tell what’s happening

The hardest moments are usually not the clear reactions. They are the ambiguous ones. A flushed face after a new food. A single cough. A tingling mouth after fresh avocado that may be the benign oral-only pattern, or may be the start of something more. Avocado makes this genuinely hard, because the profilin pattern produces mild mouth symptoms often enough that the one time it is something more does not announce itself, and a test does not draw the line for you in the moment.

The posture that works is to treat the spectrum, not to diagnose it in the moment. Know your action plan’s override signs cold, watch whether more than one body system is involved rather than fixating on a single symptom, and accept that you will sometimes give epinephrine or call the allergist for something that turns out to be nothing. That is the system working the way it is supposed to.

The competence here builds slowly, over many ambiguous afternoons. It shows up as a shorter pause before you act.

Treatment options

Strict avoidance is the floor, and everything else is decided on top of it. Avoidance of fresh avocado, plus a written action plan and epinephrine within reach where the history includes systemic reactions, is the standing setup. Because the systemic-capable protein is heat-labile, cooked forms carry less of it, but since avocado is eaten fresh, avoidance is framed around fresh and minimally processed forms, and the eat-or-avoid call stays with the allergist.

There is no avocado immunotherapy. There is no FDA-approved avocado treatment, no community off-label protocol, and no investigational avocado oral or sublingual immunotherapy with published efficacy (NIAID Addendum 2017). So unlike peanut, milk, or egg, there is no active-treatment path to discuss for avocado itself.

The latex side of management. Because avocado reactivity so often sits with latex sensitivity, management usually includes evaluation for latex allergy and, where it is confirmed, latex-precaution counseling and latex avoidance (Blanco 1994, Brehler 1997). The latex allergy itself, and natural-rubber-latex avoidance, are managed with the allergist and the treating clinicians; this page records the avocado-side implication, and the care-access precaution of telling every provider about a latex allergy, without prescribing.

The broader picture. General food-allergy biologics such as omalizumab have a role in food allergy broadly, but there is no avocado-specific indication, and none is claimed here. The field moves; this is where it stands as of writing.

Not medical advice. Whether and how to manage is a conversation with your allergist.

Day-to-day living

School and day care. A child with systemic avocado reactions needs a written plan on file, epinephrine truly accessible, and trained staff. In US public schools, a 504 plan is the usual way to put that in writing. Because avocado is not a labeled allergen, the practical guard is naming it plainly to the people who handle food, and watching guacamole, sushi, and plant-based snacks.

Restaurants. The risk is hidden avocado and cross-contact more than the obvious menu item. Bowls, salads, sushi, brunch spots, and anything “plant-based” or “with healthy fats” carry higher avocado risk. A chef card that names avocado plainly does more than a verbal order across a loud kitchen.

Medical and dental care (the latex point). If there is a latex allergy alongside the avocado allergy, say so at every dental, surgical, and hospital visit, so the team can use non-latex gloves and devices. It is the one care-access habit specific to this allergy, and it is worth repeating even when it feels redundant.

Travel and gatherings. Bring more epinephrine than you think you need where the history warrants it, carry food you trust, and look up pharmacies and emergency numbers before you land. Avocado is dense in brunch and bowl-style settings and in plant-based spreads; bringing your own food and being plain with hosts beats hoping a buffet is safe.

Prognosis and outgrowing

Avocado is not framed in the literature as a commonly outgrown childhood food allergy; it most often presents in adults, in the context of latex sensitization (Blanco 1994). There is no published pediatric outgrow-rate figure for avocado at the quality floor, so this page states none, and there is no established avocado-specific resolution marker of the kind that exists for some other allergens. Where avocado reactivity is part of latex-fruit syndrome, its course tends to track the latex sensitization.

Reassessment cadence is individualized and is not set by an avocado-specific guideline. It is driven by whether reactions have been oral-only or systemic and by the course of any confirmed latex allergy, and the clinical default is individualized reassessment by history (NIAID Addendum 2017). This page names the factors that move the cadence and does not prescribe a single re-testing interval. The one definitive test of tolerance is a supervised oral food challenge with fresh fruit; the conversation about whether and when is the allergist’s.

Questions for your allergist

You do not have to walk in knowing the science. You have to walk in with the right questions, and these are them.

  1. Does the avocado picture look like the systemic kind (the Pers a 1 chitinase, latex-fruit) or the oral-only kind (the Pers a 4 profilin), and what does that mean for how careful we need to be?
  2. Should we test for latex sensitization given the strong avocado-latex link, and what would a positive result change?
  3. If there is a latex allergy, what should we tell dentists, surgeons, and anaesthetists, and how do we make sure latex-free care is used?
  4. Does the latex-fruit link mean we also need to be careful with banana, kiwi, and chestnut, and how do we test that rather than just avoiding everything?
  5. Which hidden avocado sources (avocado oil in foods and cosmetics, plant-based fat blends, sushi, guacamole) matter most for how we actually eat?
  6. Is carrying epinephrine warranted given our reaction history, and what should our written action plan say?
  7. When and how should we reassess, given that there is no avocado-specific schedule?

The frame: how to hold this

There are two worlds, and a severe food allergy moves a family from one into the other. In the recoverable world, a mistake is a lesson. A forgotten jacket is a cold afternoon. In the irrecoverable world, one wrong protein is not a lesson, because the cost of the error can be the person you are protecting. When someone tells an allergy family to relax, they are speaking from the first world to someone who has had to move to the second. They think the family is anxious. The family is not anxious. The family is calibrated.

The work, then, is to sort what is on your side of the line from what is not. On your side: the ingredient lists you read because the label will not flag avocado for you, the latex question you raise with the allergist, the latex precaution you say out loud at the dentist, the epinephrine that travels where the history warrants it, the chef card that names avocado plainly. Not on your side: the “plant-based” spread that folds in avocado oil and does not emphasize it, the kitchen that purees avocado into a sauce, the relative who thinks one bite is kindness. You do the things on your side fully, and you stop apologizing for them. And you hold, without pretending otherwise, that the other side is real and partly random, and that a stacked defense reduces the risk without ever closing the gap to zero.

This page does not promise safety. It lays out the layers and names the gap, and it leaves the calibration to you and your allergist, who actually know the person you are protecting.

Voices: living with avocado allergy

Attributed published narratives, kept separate from the clinical content above. One person’s experience, never medical guidance, and never a clinical claim.

Lindiwe Lewis, a London food-allergy writer, was diagnosed with an avocado allergy after a kiwifruit reaction and once had a strongly positive avocado skin-prick test. Re-tested as an adult, she tested negative to avocado and banana, was offered a supervised oral food challenge by her allergist, and passed. She has written about how terrifying the weeks after passing were, how hyper-aware of her body she became, and how the fear eventually gave way to the joy of eating a food she had long been denied.

Source: Lindiwe Lewis, Allergic Living, 2025. This was one person’s experience and it turned entirely on a supervised challenge and a clinician’s instructions; do not try this without your allergist.

“I’m allergic to peanuts, tree nuts, dairy, eggs, soy, avocado, banana, kiwi, coconut, rice, peas, and chocolate. I’ve had allergies since I was diagnosed at six months, and I’ve struggled with allergy related anxiety since kindergarten.” Writing to other allergic teens, she adds: “We live with a life-threatening condition, and any anxiety and fear you experience are perfectly valid and expected.”

Source: Alia, FARE Teen Advisory Group, “Food Allergy Anxiety” (foodallergy.org). One teen’s experience of living with avocado among many allergens, not medical guidance.

  • Where avocado hides: the full label scan and the labeling-law reality
  • Oral allergy syndrome and the pollen-driven plant-food reactions, including profilin
  • Latex-fruit syndrome: avocado, banana, kiwi, chestnut, and natural rubber latex
  • Reading labels for foods that are not regulated allergens
  • Avocado recalls and alerts

These companion pages are being written and will be linked here as each one goes live.

Frequently asked questions

Is avocado a common food allergy?

Isolated avocado allergy is uncommon. Most clinically meaningful avocado allergy sits on the latex-fruit link: a person allergic to natural rubber latex can react to avocado, banana, kiwi, and chestnut through a shared protein (Blanco 1994). It is more often described in adults than in young children.

Is avocado a labeled allergen?

No. Avocado is not one of the US FALCPA major allergens and is not on the EU Annex II list, so it does not have to be declared in bold on a label (FALCPA; EU 1169). The reliable habit is reading the full ingredient list and watching for avocado oil and plant-based fat blends (see Reading labels).

If I’m allergic to latex, can I eat avocado?

It is a tested question, not an automatic yes or no. Latex and avocado share a protein, so a latex allergy raises the chance of reacting to avocado, banana, kiwi, and chestnut, but whether any one person reacts is a clinical assessment with your allergist, not a population rate (Brehler 1997). A known latex allergy is a reason to have that conversation (see Cross-reactivity).

Does cooking make avocado safe?

Not as a rule. The systemic-capable avocado protein is heat-labile, so cooked avocado carries less of it, but avocado is almost always eaten fresh, so that rarely changes real-world exposure. Whether any form of avocado is safe for a given person is the allergist’s call, not something to test at home.

Is avocado oil a problem?

It can be. Refined avocado oil is usually low in protein and lower-risk, while unrefined or cold-pressed oil retains more protein and is a more plausible exposure, in food and in skincare. This page does not call refined oil safe for you; that is the allergist’s call (see Hidden sources).

References and medical review

This page is pending independent medical review; the note at the top of the page applies until a reviewer is assigned. The references below resolve every in-body citation. The cross-reactivity and hidden-source claims on this page resolve to the project’s avocado research; avocado has no cleared cross-reactivity entry at the project’s verified floor, so the cross-reactivity section states that absence plainly rather than citing one.

  1. Blanco C, Carrillo T, Castillo R, Quiralte J, Cuevas M. Latex allergy: clinical features and cross-reactivity with fruits. Ann Allergy. 1994;73(4):309-314. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7943998/
  2. Brehler R, Theissen U, Mohr C, Luger T. “Latex-fruit syndrome”: frequency of cross-reacting IgE antibodies. Allergy. 1997;52(4):404-410. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9188921/
  3. Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello E, Bigi A, Ansaloni R. The oral allergy syndrome. Ann Allergy. 1988;61(6 Pt 2):47-52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3264668/
  4. Boyce JA, et al. Addendum guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy in the United States (NIAID-sponsored expert panel), cited for general food-allergy management principles applied to avocado: avoidance, epinephrine, oral food challenge, and individualized reassessment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.010
  5. Muraro A, et al. EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines, cited for general workup and anaphylaxis principles applied to avocado. Allergy. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12429 and https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12437
  6. Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (FALCPA), the US major-allergen list, which does not include avocado. Public Law 108-282, Title II. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-allergensgluten-free-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/food-allergen-labeling-and-consumer-protection-act-2004-falcpa
  7. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex II (the EU mandatory-declaration allergen list, which does not include avocado). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32011R1169

← All allergens